The author, just at the beginning of the article, reviews different ideas expressed in Georgian critic about relations between Vazha Pshavela's and Nitsshe's outlooks. Some of the critics see a lot of common between the two authors and some, on the contrary, pay great attention to the difference. But the author of the represented article, in order to express her original position, reviews such phylosophic categories as: individualism, willing, morality etc.
The author's position about the mentioned theme is realistic. She doesn't limit with Vazha Pshavela's and Nitsshe's works carried out in titles and tries to value the entire outlook of both authors. The author considers that in spite of certain likeness Vazha Pshavela and Nitsshe have different position and outlook about various questions (even Christianity).