Literature
After the radical change of state ideology follow important changes in cultural paradigms and in whole semiotic space the orientation of society about the values is changing. In the Soviet period the formation of "New personality’s" moral code there was an attempt to reconsider the idea of internal liberation (Christian analogue of "Freedom of choice"). Right for love and marriage institute as public function was the thing of serious discussions, even at the government level. Literature and criticism of that period contributed the public attitude to these discussions. In spite of the same reception the opinion of Russian and Georgian public about these problems was different. If for Russian public there was an unacceptable idea to make any changes in major oppositions (Kindness-evil, virtue-sin), for Georgian culture there was unacceptable even discussion of these problems.
The sphere of emotional estimation is controlled by so-called "Collective subconsciousness". In the legitimization process of any public standard behavior mythical archaic types make the objective criterion function. In the complete form of Soviet person modal code there is inherited transformation of Christian-orthodox archaic type that is fixed at seventh commandment and explained in the New Testament. The formation of myths is going on subconsciousness level and sthey are fixed in traditions. Accordingly, the above-mentioned difference is explained by the existence of long tradition. This problem can not be studied on the base of Marxism. It is necessary to take into account the character of European cultural processes of the second half of the XIX century and the beginning of XX-th century, to take into account such factors as "Cultivate revival", ("Sexual emancipation") as well as the esoteric idea to achieve the means of androgyny, etc.
In spite of many different sorts of forms, on the basis of all esoteric doctrines there is an achievement to "the Highest level of Knowledge", that is very close to "the idea of Lutsiferism". In the mentality of public there was no difference between "the idea of Lutsiferism" and "Satanism". Because any esoteric idea tightly depends on Sexual magic and the idea of sexual liberation also was closely connected with "Kindness-evil" or "virtue-sin" that was spread on the emotional estimation of the problem of prohibition-forbidding. That was also developed along the orientation of public.
Shota Rustaveli Institute of Literature
of the Georgian Academy of Sciences